The adult entertainment industry has launched a campaign aimed at warning voters about the risks that President Donald Trump’s victory poses to the production and distribution of pornographic content.
”don’t touch my porn” The campaign directly targets Project 2025, the Heritage Foundation’s blueprint for a future Republican presidential administration, and ties some of its more controversial proposals directly to Trump.
According to reports new york timesthe $100,000 ad campaign will run primarily online, with spots warning about conservative proposals to ban pornography run on pornographic websites.
This ad is intended to warn viewers, especially young men. public opinion poll The show is more likely to support Mr. Trump — and the implications of such a vote.
Online ads will run in battleground states most likely to determine the outcome of the election, including Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Georgia, Arizona and Nevada.
They direct viewers to the Hands Off My Porn website where they can watch it. testimony About Project 2025’s threat to the adult film industry.
The “Hands Off My Porn” campaign is aimed primarily at a heterosexual male audience and uses a heterosexual actor as its spokesperson. Holly Randall, a porn producer and key person involved in this campaign, said: pointed out To rally support for a total ban on pornography, the right frequently touts false metaphors, such as the idea that pornography “tricks” straight people into identifying as gay or transgender.
However, several gay adult film actors have recently pridea gay pop culture website run by an LGBTQ magazine. defenderabout supporting the campaign despite not being involved in it.
Performer Michael Boston described the campaign as a “brilliant” idea. “Even though some may think it’s a small thing, I feel like every drop in the bucket is important in terms of helping voters understand the options available to them,” he said. spoke. pride.
The city of Boston argues that porn censorship is a free speech issue and believes the ad could influence voters of all gender identities and sexual orientations.
However, he believes that creating video clips that effectively summarize the risks of Project 2025’s proposals in bite-sized pieces of content and sharing them widely on social media could be a great complement to existing campaigns. .
“It seems important to get as much attention as possible,” he said. “Especially since we have a few weeks until the election.”
Damien and other gay adult performers, including Dom King, said the ad is likely to resonate more with young male voters and is on a site that regular porn viewers are likely to frequent. I believe the campaign is right in its attempt to target these voters through advertising.
“Messaging is always more effective when delivered in the right context. People who consume adult content are more likely to accept hearing about threats to that content when they are already engaged with that content. “The next presidential election is extremely important. Beyond issues like the economy and foreign policy, the future of individual liberties, LGBTQ+ rights, and free expression are at stake,” King said. It may have been.
“We feel the stakes are particularly high for the adult industry and the LGBTQ+ community, as a conservative victory could lead to increased restrictions that directly impact livelihoods and personal freedoms.”
It should be noted that Project 2025’s proposal to ban “pornography” is not limited to outlawing the performance of actual sexual acts on camera or the distribution of videos depicting them. preface by Heritage Foundation President Kevin Roberts is calling for both producers and distributors to be jailed and the telecom and technology companies that make pornography accessible to the public to be shut down.
Under Project 2025’s broad definition of what constitutes “pornography,” law enforcement would make such bans illegal, both visual and written depictions of LGBTQ identities, particularly transgender identities. may be interpreted in any way. Adult or young adult fiction books that deal with sex, sexuality, or feature LGBTQ characters. Visual depictions of gender nonconformity, including drugs. and even nonfiction books and pamphlets that teach about sexual health, such as contraception and safe sex practices.
As a result, various individuals such as artists, non-pornographic photographers, teachers, librarians, healthcare workers, doctors, and public health activists are prosecuted and imprisoned for simply sharing or distributing information on such topics. Possibly.
said Liz Plank, co-founder of Hotties for Harris. the hill She said she thinks Democrats should be more open about Project 2025’s proposal to criminalize pornography, especially when it comes to younger male viewers.
“Democrats should be asking young men, ‘Do you want the government to check your search history?'” she says. “They should be asking, ‘Do you want to go to jail for consuming pornography?'”
Echoing these concerns, adult performer Lil Buff Bro also expressed concerns about how far-reaching and potentially problematic the Project 2025 proposal could be, especially in terms of freedom of expression and personal privacy. It is important for the “No Pornography” campaign to be clear about this. If it is implemented.
“By outlining how these laws criminalize individuals who store, view, or perform in pornography, they should raise concerns for those who use pornography as a regular means of stress relief,” he said. spoke. pride. “Masturbation is a normal and healthy activity that many people engage in and can improve sleep quality, improve mood, relieve stress, and more.”
Lil Buff Bro also warns that some viewers may be skeptical about whether such a ban would actually affect them personally, and that they’re trying to educate themselves about Trump and Project 2025. Those are the people who need it most.
“Some people may think they can just watch porn elsewhere or save it to their computers before the law takes effect,” he says. “However, the way this law is described – that it monitors everything we see – means that this law could be used in a more dystopian society where it is a crime to engage in private self-pleasure behind closed doors. This suggests that it may lead to.
Source: Metro Weekly – www.metroweekly.com
