Sam Castañeda Holdren had no business with Scouting America. He had never been part of the organization or volunteered. He never learned how to pitch a tent or tell the difference between edible and poisonous mushrooms. That’s why he never imagined he would be the one defending this lawsuit.
Stay up to date on LGBTQ+ news and politics. Sign up for The Advocate’s email newsletter.
But in late February, the youth organization formerly known as the Boy Scouts of America sued an Arizona entrepreneur over the name of his LGBTQ-focused travel brand, Queer Scouts.
related: Pete Hegseth declares Scouting America will eliminate transgender tolerance and diversity programs
related: Scouting America says it will continue to welcome transgender children after Pete Hegseth claimed they were not welcome (
of lawsuitThe lawsuit, filed Feb. 25 in federal court in Texas, accuses Holdren’s companies, Toro International LLC and Q Tours LLC, of trademark infringement and unfair competition related to their use of the word “Scout.” Scouting America alleges the brand unfairly trades on a series of trademarks built around the terms “SCOUT,” “SCOUTS,” and “SCOUTING.” The group claims these terms have been associated with youth programs for more than a century.
The suit asks a judge to block Holdren from using the name “Queer Scout” and related websites and social media accounts, and seeks damages and attorney’s fees.
For Holdren, whose company Out in Colombia runs LGBTQ+ travel experiences in Colombia, the lawsuit felt surreal.
“We’re just a small LGBTQ-owned travel company serving adult travelers,” Holdren said in an interview. defender. “It is very difficult to see how anyone could realistically confuse Queer Scouts, an LGBTQ tourism brand, with a youth scouting organization.”
A travel brand built around the queer community
The brand was born out of Holdren’s tourism business, which creates experiences for LGBTQ+ travelers visiting Colombia.
Trips range from boat tours and cultural excursions to nightlife events and community gatherings aimed at connecting visitors with the local queer community. The business primarily targets adult travelers seeking an LGBTQ-friendly tourism experience.
Holdren said the business bears no resemblance to a youth program.
Still, Scouting America argues that the name can cause confusion because the Scout organization also organizes group outings, trips and activities. According to the suit, the defendants have been using the Queer Scout name in marketing materials, social media and on websites promoting their services, which the lawyers are asking them to stop.
Conflict over the word “scout”
Jeremy Kaptein, an Arizona attorney representing Mr. Holdren, said the dispute raises broader legal questions about who can claim exclusive rights to the word “scout.”
“There are hundreds of federal trademark registrations containing the term ‘Scout’ or ‘Scout,’ more than 100 of which are currently in commercial use,” Kaptein said. Defender.
related: Why the American Boy Scouts changed their name and accepted everyone
Because the term is so widely used, the strength of Scouting America’s claim to exclusive rights to the term may be limited, Captaine said. The captain also pointed to previous legal arguments by the Boy Scouts in a dispute with the Girl Scouts, in which the Boy Scouts argued that the phrase “Girl Scouts” was distinct from its own trademark because of the word “girl.”
By that logic, he said, the phrase “queer scout” would become even more distinct. “Queer Scouts are as unique as Girl Scouts, if not more so,” he says.
Captain said he believes the organization may have gone too far in this case. “I think the Boy Scouts have gone too far and gotten a little too aggressive in the face of public evidence that their mark is not as strong as they claim,” he said.
Timing questions
The lawsuit comes at a complicated time for Scouting America.
Earlier this month, Trump administration Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth publicly pressured the organization to reconsider its diversity policies tied to its long-standing relationship with the Pentagon, raising questions about whether the scouting organization would continue to allow transgender youth to participate.
the organization said defender May all young people continue to be welcomed within their ranks.
Captain said he believes the legal dispute likely arose without political pressure, but that the timing raises questions.
“Things certainly get a little more interesting,” he said, noting that while the organization emphasizes inclusive policies, it faces demands from federal authorities to reverse them.
Scouting America declined to comment when asked about the lawsuit. “We do not comment on ongoing litigation,” the group said in an email. Defender.
A high-stakes game
For Holdren, this incident could have serious consequences.
Trademark litigation in federal court can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, a daunting prospect for small travel startups. Kaptein acknowledged that imbalances could affect the outcome. “In such conflicts, the party with the most powerful resources often has a significant advantage,” he said.
Still, Holdren said he would file a lawsuit if possible. “I’ve been bullied all my life,” he said. “I don’t want to back down if I don’t have to.”
Source: Advocate.com – www.advocate.com
