Lee’s bill has striking similarities to Project 2025, an initiative from the conservative Heritage Foundation that laid out President Donald Trump’s second term policy blueprint. Despite Trump’s attempts to distance himself from Project 2025, He placed the main architects of the project to an influential position of the federal government.
In the 920-page playbook, the Heritage Foundation argued that porn “does not assert First Amendment protections,” and that it should be banned. Reported by MSNBC.
“The people who produce and distribute it should be imprisoned. Educators and public librarians who intend it should be classified as registered sex offenders, and telecommunications and technology companies that promote that spread should be shut down,” the Project 2025 text reads.
Lee’s bill extends the legal definition of “indecency” that is not protected by the initial amendment to the material “appease to a proud interest” of nude or gender, “depicting, explaining or expressing sexual conduct, lacking “a literary, artistic, political or scientific value.”
Content that lawmakers feel is meeting the criteria may be defined As obscene, meaning its communication across state boundaries, including the Internet, could be criminalised under federal law.
The bill’s indecency definition is “very broad,” so it can be applied to media like the HBO Max Show game of thronessaid Rich Joylevy, president of the Woodhull Freedom Foundation. reason.
Source: BuzzFeed – LGBTQ – www.buzzfeed.com
