for 5th time in 3 yearsMontana Senator John Fuller Introduced law We are targeting young transgender young people. State Supreme Court Turned over Similar law Sponsoring Fuller 2023. The new form may have indicated the Republican plans to reconstruct the judicial division of Montana in support of conservatism.Other previous repetitions of the bill are simply I couldn’t pass。 Now he is looking at a new target, a transgender child’s parent.
Please get the latest information Lgbtq+ News and politics. Register with the Advocate e -mail newsletter.
The Senate bill No. 164 submitted on Wednesday, January 22, is a crime that makes gender positive care such as surgery for transformers under the age of 16, adolescent blockers, hormone replenishment therapy, etc. under the law on child abuse. It is.
“All major medical associations in the United States have supported this kind of treatment,” said Akira Dia Nose, Secretary -General of Montana, ACLU. “This bill is obliged that the government excessively intervenes in personal decisions that should be determined between family and the physician.”
Fuller, the proposer of the bill, has been trying to enact the anti -transformer law and has a long -standing track record that has failed. In 2021, he introduced two projects as a member of Montana House. another invoice He targets medical professionals who provide gender positive care to transgender people, but neither passed the parliament. He was also a planator for the ban of transformers in the sports world (not mentioned in the transformer man) in the sports world, which was partially set by the Montana State Supreme Court. Turn over in 2022.
Fuller’s 2023 Medical bill for young people was passed by the State and the Senate. Republican Governor Greg Jeanforte signed and enacted as a law, but the State Court considered the same.Unconstitutional“— Quoted Montana privacy rights.
This time, not completely prohibited, Fuller invoice Re -categorize medical treatment for young transgenders based on the Montana Child Abuse Law. In particular, it is intended for “affirmation” for the treatment of “changing the appearance” of children.[. . .] If the appearance and recognition do not match the biological gender of the child, the child’s recognition of the child’s gender. It will fall under the Montana Child Abuse Ordinance.
With this bill, Montana will be the first state in the United States that clearly crimes parents just because children have gender -compliant procedures and hormone therapy.
Half of all The legal restrictions on medical care for young transgenders have already been passed. Oklahoma State Congress Considered, But it didn’t pass in the end, Similar invoice In 2021, he committed a transgender child’s parent. Greg Abbott of Governor Texas I issued an order It is obliged to investigate the state social services to surveys in transgender children who have been treated to affirm gender, but as many states that are targeted for this kind of care. teeth Holded by the court Suppose you infringed the constitutional rights of transgender people and their families.
Unlike the Montana State Senate No. 164, the Texas command did not completely commit parent to support transgender children. Investigation was needed, but it was not always punished. Until now, the only policy that has endured the judiciary’s trials is targeting medical providers and national funding, not parents, and the balance of the ongoing Scotus lawsuit. If the Montana bill is passed, the basics of dangerous precedents may be established.
Research also shows that anti -transformeries can create a medical atrophy effect and hinder the medical care of transgender people. All gender self -acknowledgmentsDoctors may limit or refuse treatment if they may suspect that young people are transgender or eventually become transgender.
Montana, including the proposal of Fuller, faced at least 10 anti -LGBTQ Even the 2023 bill alone. Hundreds Since then, anti -transformer bills at the state level and national level have been introduced or advanced.
Despite the Supreme Court’s ruling, Fuller’s recent attempt to implement this policy is more than just a political drama. In addition to attacking transgender children’s access to medical care, the Fuller Montana Republican Congress is also looking at the judicial division. The members of the Diet have tightened the court, damaging their credit, and limiting the scope of judicial examination, including several bills submitted on the same day as the Senate bill 164. One of these policies is to delete the authority of the court that accepts lawyers. Participate in the Bar Association and give the following authority instead Governor.
The Montana Supreme Court is elected by non -party elections, and candidates cannot run with the party flag. Fullers and their friends I want to change it。 Currently, only six states use the judge elections by the party. and, American Advancement Center “The party -like elections will increase election funds and the greater party awareness between judges.”
According to Henry Seaton, a lobbyist of ACLU, Montana, this initiative could lead to the state of power by the State Republican Party.
“One of the leading theory is that if you can pass the party -style judicial election, you will feel that the court system will make these unconstitutional bills more advantageous,” Seaton said.
These initiatives may be independently powerful in Montana, but their strategies are equivalent to the strategy used by politicians nationwide. Report from the Brennan Judicial Center According to a survey, in 2023, there were 124 bills in 29 states that “attack the independence of the court”. These bills have a wide range of legal means that “introduces further politics in the judge’s selection method”, such as permits “judge shopping” that enables the judge to carefully select a specific case. It was covered.
December 2024 document Fuller mentioned the myriad of complaints proposed by the Republican Party of the Montana Congress against the Justice Office. The letter, co -named by more than a dozen Republican Congress, claims that “the Montana Supreme Court has a long hostile history for Republican and conservatives.” They also supported the Republican Party when the members of the Private Lawyer Office criticized the Republican Party in the committee of the Bar Association and called Governor Jangforte “Governor Jangfo Skin”, and supported the “implicit attack” against the Republican Party. I claim. Neither the State Lawyer Association nor Fuller’s office did not comment in time.
Laws that deprive the state judicial rights can risk the conventional court neutral. For example, in Mississippi, the establishment of a new judge appointed by the state to “select” voters in constituencies in which the blacks account for a majority, and the voters in other areas in the state select a judge. It was established.
Mississippi supreme court I have overturned the law.
This article was published first Morning Erin。
Source: Advocate.com – www.advocate.com
