JD Vance rapidly becomes the most blocked account on Bluesky

“Hello, Bruski, I was told that this app has become a place to go to political discussion and analysis of common sense,” Vance wrote. “That’s why I’m excited to be here with you guys.”

Within just one day, Vance became the most blocked account on Bluesky. Clear skithe platform’s unofficial data tracker. At the time of publication, Vance was blocked by over 117,500 accounts, of which over 29,000 have blocked him in the past 24 hours. He has gained 10,000 followers since joining the site.

The title previously belonged to anti-trans journalist Jesse Singal. Glaad criticized To spread harmful misinformation LGBTQ+People. It takes 12 days for Singal to become the most blocked account, and users have launched a petition asking the site to delete their account. He currently has over 81,000 people blocked.

“The only thing I’ve ever achieved in my life is that being Vice President wasn’t enough for JD Vance. He needed more,” Singal said. Posted On X/Twitter in response to news. “We’re in hell.”

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that while Tennessee law prohibits gender-affirming care for trans youths, allowing the same treatment for non-trans youths does not constitute gender discrimination and therefore does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

In a snippet of his opinion shared by Vance, Thomas argued that the court should not listen to “so-called experts,” accusing medical experts of “allowing ideology to affect medical guidance.” He then falsely argued that “there is no medical consensus on how best to treat a child’s gender discomfort.”

American Medical Association, American Psychiatric Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Psychiatry for Children and Adolescents, World Medical Association,and World Health Organization All agree that gender-affirming care is Based on evidence And medically, it is necessary not only for adults but for minors as well. Out 55 Peer-reviewed studieswe have not found that gender transitions have negative consequences.

Judge Sonia Sotomayor argued in the objection that the law explicitly discriminates on both gender and gender, as “the law explicitly classifies both gender and gender, as male (but not female) adolescents can receive drugs that look like boys and women.”

The decision “invites Congress to discrimination by irrevocably damaging the equal protection clause and explicitly hiding the blatant sexual classification,” Sotomayor wrote. “It also allows us to avoid harming trans children and their loved ones and their parents and families, without thinking about it again. I challenge them because there is no constitutional justification for the consequences.”

Back in Bluesky, Vance asked, “If you want to have a real argument, why would you choose such a polarization issue, why isn’t it relevant to more Americans?”

Another said, “It’s just a matter of polarization because I want to pretend that an ignorant, biased child who abuses superstitious sadists like Vance knows more than a doctor.”