Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives have adopted a new rules package that would allow them to quickly consider and vote on transgender sports bans without the opportunity to introduce amendments.
Below the text of rules packageThe 12 bills long prioritized by Republican lawmakers — mostly on immigration, anti-abortion policies and fracking — are expected to be voted on “as read.”
It “amends the Education Reform Act of 1972 to recognize sex solely on the basis of reproductive biology and genetics at birth for purposes of determining compliance with Title IX of the Act in athletics.” It also includes a measure that states that
The description of the countermeasure seems to refer to: invoice It was reintroduced by U.S. Rep. Greg Steube (R-Florida), known as the Protecting Women and Girls in Sports Act.
The proposed bill would require any organization that receives federal funding to “operate, sponsor, or promote athletic programs or activities” to specifically designate women as male at birth. It is prohibited to participate in activities that are
Men can practice with women’s sports teams, but cannot participate in activities designated by women.
The bill states that “gender shall be recognized solely on the basis of a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at the time of birth.” It also directs the Comptroller General to report on how allowing transgender people to participate in female-designated sports teams would negatively impact female athletes.
A previous version of Steube’s bill passed the U.S. House of Representatives in 2023, but did not get a vote in the then-Democratic-controlled Senate.
Companion claim is being made introduced In the Senate, Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) spoke.
With Republicans currently in control of the chamber, the bill is expected to pass and be signed into law by President-elect Donald Trump.
“The radical left is out of step with the American people on the issue of protecting women’s sports,” Steube said in a statement. “Americans are vocal about not wanting men to steal sports records from women, invade their daughters’ locker rooms, replace female athletes on their teams, or deprive their daughters of scholarship opportunities.” ”
Steube’s bill is vague in how it defines sex. Additionally, the measure does not discuss how intersex individuals will be considered.
As the journalist pointed out maddie castiganintersex athletes, including athletes with genetic conditions like Swyer syndrome, have historically been targeted That’s because of anti-trans sports bans that don’t take into account naturally occurring differences in hormone levels, chromosomal makeup, or secondary sex characteristics.
Additionally, Castigan points out that past studies have shown that transgender women are taking puberty blockers. no biological benefit Because they have never experienced “male puberty,” they are more likely than cisgender women to have experienced male puberty, and trans women who have experienced male puberty are less likely to experience male puberty after two years of hormone therapy. lose many of its advantages.
Castigan also said that measures mandating gender segregation at birth could give transgender men who take testosterone to change their gender an unfair advantage over other athletes. They also point out that it forces men to compete with women.
“Banning trans sports has no clear moral or scientific justification and does not protect women, cis or trans,” Castigan wrote on her Substack. “If Republicans really care about protecting women’s sports, they should focus their energy on more salient and broader issues like rampant sexual harassment and misogyny against athletes who participate in women’s sports.”
Congressional Republicans are also pushing for rules that would prohibit transgender individuals from using the restroom that matches their gender identity. Published in the January 3rd issue. Congressional Record This is a policy that mandates that single-sex facilities within the U.S. Capitol must be based on “biological sex,” although the term is not clearly defined.
The rule was not included in the rules package approved by lawmakers last week, but it remains in effect under the authority given to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-Louisiana) under the rules of the House. The House of Commons is granted “general control” over the facilities it manages.
The ban would be enforced by the House Sergeant at Arms, but only those assigned female at birth (some transgender people can “pass” as cisgender) would be allowed to use the single. It is unclear whether Sgt. sex facility.
Source: Metro Weekly – www.metroweekly.com
