The federal government’s chief office for workplace civil rights has reversed course on one of the most significant cases regarding transgender rights, allowing federal agencies to ban transgender employees from using restrooms consistent with their gender identity.
Stay up to date on LGBTQ+ news and politics. Sign up for The Advocate’s email newsletter.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has overturned key parts of a landmark 2015 ruling on transgender rights, narrowing protections for transgender federal employees and escalating a conflict between the Trump administration and Congressional Democrats over the future of workplace equality.
In a 2-1 decision issued on February 26, the EEOC ruled against a transgender federal employee who filed a discrimination claim after being denied access to the women’s restroom at work. The policy banning her access to the restroom was adopted under an executive order from President Donald Trump. 14168“Protecting Women from Gender Ideological Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government,” published on President Trump’s Inauguration Day in January 2025.
Roverjoyed:Trump administration moves to strip employment discrimination protections for transgender people
related: EEOC follows President Trump’s ‘bisexuality’ order and won’t defend transgender and non-binary people
related: Lawsuit challenges EEOC’s failure to investigate anti-transgender discrimination
The executive order declared that it is the policy of the United States to recognize only the male-female binary and directed federal agencies to remove all references to “gender ideology” from their policies and guidance. The report called for documents, communications and internal documents to be revised to reflect a person’s gender assigned at birth, and for enforcement of protection in “intimate spaces” on this basis.
The new federal department’s appellate decision reverses some of the following: Lusardi vs. Department of War The lawsuit asserted that prohibiting transgender employees from using the restroom consistent with their gender identity constitutes unlawful sex discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The 2015 ruling also concluded that repeated intentional gender changes may violate federal law. original Lusardi The decision stemmed from a complaint filed by a transgender Army civilian who was barred from using the women’s restroom and directed to use single-occupancy facilities instead.
related: Lawmakers demand EEOC address gender identity discrimination
related: The government has abandoned LGBTQ+ workers. Former civil rights lawyers step up efforts
The EEOC concluded that the agency’s conduct violated Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination, based on a pre-2012 ruling. Macy vs Holderargued that discrimination against transgender people constitutes discrimination “on the basis of sex.” The commission wrote at the time that denying workers bathroom access based on their gender identity “deprived Complainant of equal status, respect, and dignity in the workplace.”
Under the new ruling, federal agencies could exclude transgender employees from restrooms based on their gender identity. “A man who identifies as a ‘trans woman’ is still a man, and a woman who identifies as a ‘trans man’ is still a woman,” the ruling said, misidentifying the gender of the employee who brought the complaint. According to the Human Rights Campaign, the commission acknowledged that existing case law does not support its new interpretation.
“This green light to discriminate against hard-working Americans is an egregious dereliction by the EEOC and a capitulation by Commissioner Andrea Lucas to President Donald Trump’s orders, and will make the job of keeping workers safe everywhere even more difficult,” HRC Director of Legal Policy Katherine Oakley said in a statement. “To all transgender workers who are reading yet another attack in a long series of attacks on your dignity by this administration: We will not stop fighting for an America where you can go to work, get paid, and go home to put food on the table without fear that your ability to provide for yourself and your family depends on overcoming discrimination and prejudice in the workplace.”
related: LGBTQ+ groups say Trump administration’s denial of gender-affirming accommodations to federal employees is illegal
related: What can transgender people do about President Trump’s executive order? Become a plaintiff, says Lambda Legal
This decision applies only to federal agencies subject to the EEOC’s administrative complaint process. This law does not apply to private employers and is not binding on federal courts. Federal courts continue to be governed by the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, which holds that Title VII protects gay and transgender workers from discrimination based on gender.
U.S. Rep. Mark Takano of California, chairman of the Congressional Equality Caucus, criticized the move.
“The EEOC was created with the express mission of protecting American workers from discrimination, but under President Trump and Chairman Andrea Lucas, the commission has abandoned that duty in order to further President Trump’s radical, anti-equality, and anti-worker agenda,” Takano said in a statement. “The Supreme Court made clear in Bostock that transgender workers are protected from discrimination, but the EEOC cannot do that.” [undo] their protection. ”
The decision comes as Democrats attempt a legislative response. In early February, Representative Ayanna Pressley of Massachusetts and Senator Patty Murray of Washington reintroduced the BE HEARD Act, a workplace harassment bill that would eliminate forced arbitration and nondisclosure agreements, extend civil rights protections to independent contractors and interns, extend the period for reporting harassment, and clarify that federal civil rights law protects against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
“All workers deserve to be safe and respected in the workplace, and this shouldn’t be up for debate,” Pressley said. “Under the Trump Administration, the EEOC has weakened protections and exposed workers to workplace discrimination, harassment, and abuse.”
Source: Advocate.com – www.advocate.com
