Note: I arrived at this observation after thinking about war and public debate. Many of our moments are about speed, certainty, and noise. Iris Murdoch suggests that morality begins something simpler: paying attention. We are very good at jumping to our own assumptions.
The first scolding I remember was, “Be careful!” I listened carefully. At the time, that meant you should stop looking out the window. my name is williamcame first. Then things got serious.
Iris Murdoch, who passed away in 1999, was a prominent moral philosopher and one of Britain’s leading novelists in the second half of the 20th century. Although she did not believe in a personal God, her ideas were shaped by the Anglican world in which she lived. As an atheist, she still addressed religious issues. In her moral philosophy, goodness fills the role once held by God.
Murdoch did not distinguish between his philosophical works and novels. For her, ethics was not about rules and decisions. It focused on how we live, what we observe or ignore, and how we struggle and fail in daily life.
She thought we boil morality down to choices, principles, and reasons. Its real basis is perception, and above all, the perception of others. From this perspective, moral failure often precedes action. We don’t make the wrong choices from the beginning. First of all, we look at things from the wrong direction.
For Murdoch, evil is not only about the dramatic and spectacular. Brutal people, indifferent bureaucrats, and tyrants are not monsters. These are people who are caught up in their own fantasies, resentments, and stories of self-justification. For some people, it becomes just an idea or image in their head. We are shaped more by what we imagine others think about us than by what they actually think about us. After all, the distance between them and us is shorter than we think.
Death brings clarity. Recognizing our mortality disrupts our fantasy-driven soliloquy and reminds us that we are contingent rather than the center of the universe we imagine it to be. This calmness is important. Honest attention to mortality, in Murdoch’s words, “depersonalizes” or loosens the grip of the ego and allows us to see others as they truly are. To understand someone, it helps to know who they are. When attention is right, good actions occur.
For Murdoch, the good is something real and independent, not determined by human desires or social conventions. That victory is not a historical event, but a fact about reality itself. No war, no catastrophe, no accumulation of injustice or evil can weaken it. For Murdoch, this is not a hope, but a certainty. Good people don’t need room in their lives. Some of us think so, too.
Toward the good is itself justified. It defines what it means to be human. There is no guarantee of compensation. The virtuous may suffer, but the immoral may prosper. Nevertheless, the Good remains.
This idea is found in many traditions. It’s the heart of Rabbi Lawrence Kushner. God was in this place and I didn’t knowfocuses on a scene from Genesis. After Jacob betrays his brother, he stops in the desert at night. He dreams of a ladder that connects heaven and earth.
When he wakes up, he is upset. This is not because something new has appeared, but because what was there has become invisible. “Surely the Lord is in this place, but I did not know it.” It’s hard to see without looking. Kushner describes the moment I In lower case, I, Don’t belittle it, confess it. The last thing you see is yourself, small and humble.
Murdoch did not use the word God, instead referring to the “sovereignty of good.” Still, her views are consistent with Kushner’s. Most of the time, we’re so wrapped up in ourselves that we don’t notice what’s important. Crises and dreams like Jacob’s can break the spell.
Despite our guilt and fear, we are not alone and, like Jacob, we are loved beyond measure. Murdoch lived true to his sovereignty against the zeitgeist.
We do wrong things because we have the wrong perspective.
Most truths are not hidden. they are invisible.
Love is the practice of seeing what is there.
notes and reading
Iris Murdoch (1919-1999) taught philosophy at Oxford, wrote more than 20 novels, and won the Booker Prize in 1978. Her philosophical work is based on Plato and influenced by French philosopher and mystic Simone Weil’s reflections on “attention.”
Murdoch’s most famous person is sovereignty of good (1970). For her, evil arises from the ego’s distortion of reality. Goodness requires learning to see properly. Her central concept is “selflessness.” That is, the ego’s grip on perception is loosened until it can see itself clearly by breaking out of its ways. just be careful (Her keyword) That’s how it happens. The French aphorist Joseph Joubert (1754–1824) expected something close to this. “Truth is not created, it exists. One can only see it, unravel it, discover it, and expose it.” Joseph Joubert’s Notesed. Paul Auster (2005), 28 years old.
-
Murdoch believed that novels can demonstrate moral life more clearly than abstract arguments, and her novels often reveal a yearning for the spiritual in a post-theistic age. The Bell (1958) is a striking example of how idealism, jealousy, and spiritual yearning intermingle in everyday life.
gravity and grace — Simone Weil (2002). Reflections on suffering, attention, and divine reality. That rigorous spiritual vision strongly influenced Murdoch’s understanding of caution as a moral and almost religious discipline.
Grace and Necessity: Thoughts on Art and Love — Rowan Williams (2006). Williams, a former Archbishop of Canterbury and a leading Anglican theologian, similarly treats art and love as exercises in genuine attention to reality rather than projections of the self, a vision that is very similar to Murdoch’s “selflessness.”
God was in this place and I didn’t know, 25th Anniversary Edition, Rabbi Lawrence Kushner (2016). Meditate on the Biblical story of Jacob’s dream and explore how the sacred goes unnoticed in everyday life. Kushner, a widely read teacher of Jewish spirituality, explores the spiritual aspects of being, being aware, and paying attention, themes that resonate with Murdoch’s “fair attention.”
For the mentally adventurous: Thanks to Addison Hodges Hart (practical mystic). “Hesychasm”: not quietism, not just a technique, but a forgotten discipline of inner silence, a disciplined attention to the God that rationalism has long maintained can only be approached through the mind. Paramus (triad14th century) If not: it becomes clear why. It doesn’t unite. Murdoch would recognize his own move to step aside so that reality could be seen. See Nikolai Gerasimov orthodox christianity (March 12, 2026).
Before the end of liberalism
Where is God in war?
Approximately 2+2=5
Source: 2 + 2 = 5 – williamgreen.substack.com
